StatsTTest Values?

What is the P parameter returned by StatsTTest?

I am designing a demo for a class. It shows a "theoretical" normal distribution. It adds "raw data" to the distribution (using gnoise()). I want to return a report on the Accuracy of the raw data to represent the theory.

I understand the hypotheses tests based on t and tcrit. What is confusing me is the P value. Is this a probability of the null hypothesis being true? Or vice-versa? Or something else?

Alternatively, what might be a better message to report on this demo about the accuracy of the "raw data" relative to "theory" (an infinite population size).
sjr51
jjweimer wrote: Is this a probability of the null hypothesis being true?


Yes. As for a better message: there's a nice video by Geoff Cummings called Dance of The P-Values, which illustrates the point you are (I think) trying to make. It's on youtube and highly recommended.
Igor
Jeff,

The null hypothesis in this case is that the means are equal. The P value is the probability that 't' is outside the critical values by chance. This is the area under the t-distribution curve away from the +-critical value (for two tails).

The "Dance of the P-Values" is indeed a very nice example that should not be difficult to reproduce in IGOR.

A.G.
WaveMetrics, Inc.
jjweimer
Igor wrote: ...
The "Dance of the P-Values" is indeed a very nice example that should not be difficult to reproduce in IGOR.


Thanks. I am heading that way. My latest iteration shows as in this figure.



I hope to post the demo here soon. Including a way to "build the stats in steps" may have to be something I do as a summer project.

--
J. J. Weimer
Chemistry / Chemical & Materials Engineering, UAH
statsdemo2.png (117.08 KB)
jjweimer
Version 1 of the demonstration has just been posted. See the recent forum posts to find it. The package includes a screen cast of the experiment in action.

I hope folks in education might find this tool can help them explain the concepts of precision and accuracy to students. Indeed, the driving force for me to make it was a realization that students in undergraduate chemistry labs seemed to have no clue what the concepts really mean. Even I learned some important things by the time I was done.

Enjoy!

--
J. J. Weimer
Chemistry / Chemical & Materials Engineering, UAH